Imaginate que estamos en una clase
Profe; Vamos a hablar de a (armas), y para ello vamos a ver un documental a favor de prohibir a. Ya, hemos visto todo lo que teniamos que ver sobre a.
Alumno: Pero profe, solo hemos visto un punto de vista, no hemos visto nada el otro punto de vista, ni ninguna critica al documental que hemos visto. ¿Como vamos a tener una opinion bien formada sobre un tema si solo escuchamos a una parte? ¿No habra que escuchar a las dos?
Gastaste 2 horas en ver un documental en contra de un tema pero, ¿Cuanto has gastado en el punto de vista contrario?
En 30 segundos, entrando en una libreria, buscando libros sobre el tema, copio los 2 primeros.
http://www.amazon.com/Dial-911-Die-R.../dp/0964230445
Dial 911 and Die; The Shocking Truth About the Police Protection Myth
Dial 911 and Die is a book that will open your eyes and possibly even save your life, or the life of someone you love. It should be required reading for anyone who doesn't realize that he has primary, if not sole, responsibility for protecting and defending himself. And it's a wonderful resource for those of us who have accepted that responsibility in the face of overwhelming hostility from the uninformed and politically correct. ... Do the police have the obligation to arrest someone who repeatedly violates a domestic violence protective order? No. Can the police ignore an emergency call for assistance in order to do paperwork? Yes. Do the police have the obligation to respond to a 911 call for help? No. What if they promise that "help is on the way"? Do they then have an obligation to respond? Still no. If the police witness a crime in progress, must they intervene to protect the innocent? No again.
This book speaks to the irrefutable truth: police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact
http://www.amazon.com/Bias-Against-G...dp/0895261146/
The Bias Against Guns: Why Almost Everything You've Heard About Gun Control Is Wrong
Following up on his controversial study More Guns, Less Crime, economist Lott argues that widespread gun ownership prevents crime. He cites survey data and news reports to argue that the fear that victims might be armed strongly deters criminals, and that guns are used in self-defense or to ward off criminal threats about 2.3 million times a year
Slicing through the emotional--but factually wrong--arguments of gun control advocates this book busts a number of myths, demonstrating with hard statistical data and riveting anecdotes.